UK’s ‘racist’ visa screening system scrapped by government after legal challenge


Technology used to process UK visa applications is to be scrapped by the government after a legal challenge.

Campaigners argued the tool was “racist” and “discriminatory” for filtering applicants based on nationality.

The Home Office confirmed the system, which has been used in some form since 2015, will end on 7 August, adding its interim replacement will not take nationality into account.

The move has been welcomed by the two groups who had been seeking a judicial review.

Foxglove and the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) were asking the courts to declare the system unlawful and in breach of the Equality Act 2010.

Their claim centred on a computer algorithm used to assign a traffic light score to all UK visa applications, before they were even seen by human case workers.

This initial “red, amber or green risk rating” played “a major role in determining” whether the application was approved or denied, according to the JCWI.

Campaigners say some nationalities were automatically given a red traffic light risk score, and that people from these countries were more likely to be denied a visa.

The system uses data on past visa denials to decide which countries should be deemed higher risk in the future, therefore reinforcing the bias into the system over time.

The problem is known as a “feedback loop” – where past discrimination is fed into a computer program, which learns from it, and then amplifies it in the future.

Chai Patel, legal policy director of JCWI, said: “This streaming tool took decades of institutionally racist practices, such as targeting particular nationalities for immigration raids, and turned them into software.”

The successful challenge is thought to be the first of its kind against an algorithm-driven decision making system in the UK.

The pressure groups involved want more scrutiny of how such tools are used across government.

Cori Crider, founder and director of Foxglove, said: “Racist feedback loops meant that what should have been a fair migration process was, in practice, just ‘speedy boarding for white people’.

“What we need is democracy, not government by algorithm. Before any further systems get rolled out, let’s ask experts and the public whether automation is appropriate at all, and how historic biases can be spotted and dug out at the roots.”

In a statement, a Home Office spokesperson said: “We have been reviewing how the visa application streaming tool operates and will be redesigning our processes to make them even more streamlined and secure.”

“We do not accept the allegations Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants made in their Judicial Review claim and whilst litigation is still ongoing it would not be appropriate for the department to comment any further.”

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.